← 論文一覧に戻る

気候緩和のための市場メカニズムとしての炭素クレジット:機会・課題・将来展望

Carbon credits as market-based mechanisms for climate mitigation: Opportunities, challenges and future perspectives (原題)

Sharma Rubal, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, T. Princy, Meraj Ahmed, M. Raveendran

Plant Science Today📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-29#炭素価格経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.14719/pst.13998
原典: https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13998

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

炭素クレジットは再生可能エネルギーや森林・土壌炭素管理への投資を促し、排出削減と炭素隔離に金銭的価値を与える市場メカニズムである。しかし追加性、永続性、リーケージ、MRVの不整合といった課題が残り、厳格な科学・政策枠組みなしには象徴的施策に留まるリスクがある。適切に設計されれば直接削減を補完し、長期的な持続可能性目標を支える拡張可能な選択肢となる。

English

Carbon credits are market-based mechanisms that put a monetary value on carbon sequestration and emission reductions, spurring investment in renewables, forestry and soil carbon. Yet additionality, permanence, leakage and MRV inconsistencies limit their potential, risking symbolic rather than practical impact without robust regulation. Well-designed, they can complement direct emission cuts and support long-term sustainability goals.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではJ-クレジット制度やGXリーグ、SSBJ基準におけるカーボンクレジットの扱いが議論されており、MRVや追加性の課題は国内制度設計・有報開示・投資家対応に直結する。

In the global GX context

Globally, this speaks to the integrity debate around voluntary carbon markets (VCMI, ICVCM) and their interaction with compliance regimes like CSRD and ISSB disclosure, where MRV and additionality are central to credible transition finance.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:炭素クレジットのMRV・追加性・永続性に関する研究課題の全体像を把握できる。

🏢実務担当者:クレジット調達やオフセット活用時の品質評価・開示リスクの判断材料になる。

🏛政策担当者:J-クレジットや国際市場連結の制度設計でMRVと追加性基準の重要性を再確認できる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Carbon credits are a promising market-based tool for combating climate change, biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation, three of the most pressing environmental problems currently facing the global environment. Carbon credit schemes have stimulated investments in renewable energy, forestry, sustainable agriculture, soil carbon management and decreased emissions by putting a monetary value on greater carbon sequestration and reduced emissions. The public and commercial sectors can now work together to combat climate change, facilitated by mechanisms that have helped close the gap between environmental responsibility and financial viability. There must be rigorous science, open government and sound policy frameworks for carbon credits to succeed. They have not yet reached their full potential due to ongoing issues with additionality, the permanence of sequestration, leakage risks and discrepancies in measuring, reporting and verification (MRV). Without robust regulations, carbon markets risk becoming more symbolic than practical. However, carbon credits provide a scalable and adaptable alternative that may supplement direct emission reductions and support sustainability objectives in the long term when well planned and executed. Carbon credits are an essential component of global climate policies, as they promote sustainable land-use practices and reduce atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。