気候行動と持続可能な開発：先進国と途上国における公平性・正義・包摂
Climate action and sustainable development: equity, justice and inclusion in developed vs. developing economies (原題)
Subas Prasad Dhakal, Peter Waring, Julia Connell, John Burgess
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は気候行動と持続可能な開発に関する特集号の序論であり、公平性・正義・包摂（EJI）を中心軸に据える。先進国・途上国にまたがる7本の論文を統合し、ジェンダー、労働、ガバナンスと気候影響・政策対応の交差を「適応―誤適応」の枠組みで分析する。弱い排出削減コミットが省エネ技術への過度な依存など誤適応的慣行を助長し、脆弱性を再生産していると指摘する。EJIを組み込んだジェンダー対応政策、公正な労働移行、衡平なガバナンスの必要性を訴える。
English
This introductory article to a special issue frames climate action and sustainable development around equity, justice and inclusion (EJI). Synthesising seven studies across developed and developing economies, it applies an adaptation–maladaptation lens to gendered experiences, labour transitions and governance capacity. It argues that weak global mitigation commitments foster maladaptive practices—notably energy-intensive technology reliance—that perpetuate vulnerability, and calls for gender-responsive policy, just transitions and equitable governance integrating EJI.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のGX開示はScope・TCFD/SSBJ対応が中心で、EJIや公正な移行（just transition）の視点は相対的に手薄である。本特集は、移行金融や人権デューデリジェンスを巡る国際的な議論と接続する際の概念的枠組みとして参考になる。
In the global GX context
Global disclosure regimes (CSRD, ISSB, TCFD) increasingly demand social and just-transition considerations alongside emissions data. This special issue offers a conceptual bridge between EJI principles and adaptation–maladaptation outcomes, useful for framing the 'S' in ESG and transition-finance debates in developed and developing contexts.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候適応・誤適応とEJIの理論的接続が未成熟である点を整理し、今後の実証研究課題を提示する。
🏢実務担当者:公正な移行やジェンダー対応をサステナビリティ戦略・人権対応に組み込む際の概念的視座を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:排出削減コミットの弱さが誤適応を招く点を踏まえ、適応・緩和策にEJIを統合する政策設計の必要性を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose This article introduces a special issue volume on climate action and sustainable development, with a central focus on equity, justice and inclusion (EJI). It examines how climate impacts and policy responses intersect with gender, labour and governance systems, applying an adaptation–maladaptation lens to identify challenges and opportunities for equitable and inclusive climate action. Design/methodology/approach The approach synthesises multidisciplinary insights from seven articles spanning developed and developing economies. It employs an adaptation–maladaptation framework to analyse climate action through gendered experiences, policy design, labour transitions, and governance capacity. Findings The articles highlight how climate change disproportionately affects those least responsible for its causes, with vulnerabilities compounded by existing socioeconomic and structural inequalities. Weak global emissions-reduction commitments have facilitated maladaptive practices – notably increased reliance on energy-intensive technologies – that perpetuate vulnerability. Across the volume, authors illustrate the need for gender-responsive policies, just transitions in labour markets and equitable governance mechanisms that integrate EJI considerations into climate adaptation and mitigation strategies. Originality/value As an introductory article, this piece does not present original empirical data. Instead, it synthesises findings and identifies a conceptual gap – the under-theorised relationship between adaptation–maladaptation outcomes and EJI principles in empirical climate research. It concludes with a call for future research evaluating the long-term impacts of climate interventions on diverse and marginalised groups.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-03-2026-0239first seen 2026-10-01 04:46:10
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。