← 論文一覧に戻る

液化石油ガス(LPG)補助金政策の持続可能性評価:インドネシア・西ジャワ州チルボン市の事例

Assessing the Sustainability of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Subsidy Policies: Evidence from Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia (原題)

Budiman Rusli, Riki Satia Muharam

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-14#エネルギー転換対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.3390/su18189405
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18189405

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

インドネシア・チルボン市を事例に、LPG補助金政策の持続可能性をトリプルボトムライン(社会・経済・環境)で評価した質的研究。補助金はエネルギーアクセス改善やMSME支援に寄与する一方、誤配給・漏出・財政圧迫・化石燃料依存が課題と指摘。LPGを恒久解ではなく移行燃料と位置づけ、ターゲティング強化と再エネ移行を提言する。

English

A qualitative case study in Cirebon City, Indonesia, assesses LPG subsidy sustainability via the Triple Bottom Line framework. Subsidies improve energy access, household welfare, and MSME productivity, but face mistargeting, leakage, fiscal pressure, and fossil-fuel lock-in. The authors argue LPG should be a transition fuel, not a permanent solution, urging better targeting and renewable adoption.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈とは直接の接点は薄いが、化石燃料補助金の段階的廃止と移行燃料の位置づけは、日本のエネルギー政策・移行金融議論に示唆を与える。新興国での補助金ガバナンス設計の参考事例として読める。

In the global GX context

Adds a developing-country perspective to global debates on fossil-fuel subsidy reform and just transition, complementing TCFD/ISSB-aligned transition planning discussions. Relevant to how transition finance and subsidy governance interact in emerging markets.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:途上国における化石燃料補助金の持続可能性評価と移行燃料論の実証事例として参照可能。

🏢実務担当者:新興国市場でのエネルギー関連事業・サプライチェーン管理における政策リスク把握に有用。

🏛政策担当者:補助金ターゲティングとデジタルガバナンス強化、段階的な再エネ移行設計の政策的示唆を提供。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) subsidies have become an important policy instrument for improving energy affordability, reducing energy poverty, and supporting economic activities among vulnerable populations in Indonesia. However, the long-term sustainability of LPG subsidy policies remains a subject of debate due to concerns regarding fiscal burdens, governance challenges, and environmental impacts. This study aims to assess the sustainability of LPG subsidy policies through a case study in Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia, using the Triple Bottom Line framework that integrates social, economic, and environmental dimensions. A qualitative case study approach was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), field observations, and document analysis involving key stakeholders, including government agencies, Pertamina, LPG distributors, micro-enterprises, and household beneficiaries. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that LPG subsidies contribute positively to social sustainability by improving energy access, reducing household energy expenditures, and enhancing social welfare. The policy also supports economic sustainability through increased purchasing power, improved productivity of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), and local economic resilience. From an environmental perspective, LPG subsidies help reduce dependence on traditional fuels such as firewood and kerosene, thereby contributing to cleaner household energy use and indirectly supporting forest conservation. The study identifies significant challenges related to mistargeting, distribution leakages, fiscal pressures, and continued dependence on fossil fuels, which may hinder long-term sustainability and energy transition efforts. The findings suggest that LPG should be positioned as a transition fuel rather than a permanent energy solution. Strengthening subsidy-targeting mechanisms, improving digital governance systems, enhancing fiscal efficiency, and gradually promoting renewable energy adoption are essential to support sustainable energy governance and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study contributes to the literature by providing an integrated sustainability assessment of LPG subsidy policies within the context of developing countries.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。