低炭素水素市場発展のための制度的障壁と規制モデル：ロシア、EAEU、BRICS、SCOの経験
Institutional barriers and regulatory models for the development of the low-carbon hydrogen market: Experiences from Russia, the EAEU, BRICS, and the SCO (原題)
Liliya E. USACHEVA, Svetlana Valerievna Ratner, Valerii V. IOSIFOV
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ロシア、EAEU、BRICS、SCOにおける低炭素水素市場の規制・制度条件を比較分析した研究。ロシアは戦略的枠組みは整備されているが、中国・インド・ブラジル・UAEに比べ実装・認証・経済的インセンティブで遅れている。EAEUには統一基準や相互認証、共通タクソノミーが欠如し、BRICSは国内産業需要の構築に注力している。競争力は資源ポテンシャルよりも制度環境の成熟度に依存すると結論づける。
English
A comparative institutional analysis of low-carbon hydrogen market regulation across Russia, the EAEU, BRICS, and the SCO. Russia has a well-developed strategic framework but lags China, India, Brazil, and the UAE in implementation, certification depth, and economic incentives. The EAEU lacks unified standards, mutual certificate recognition, and a common taxonomy, while BRICS countries show stronger institutional momentum and domestic demand focus. Competitiveness depends more on institutional maturity than resource potential.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
水素の認証・基準・持続可能な金融の制度設計を扱う点は、日本の水素戦略やSSBJ/トランジション・ファイナンスの議論と問題意識を共有する。ただし対象地域がロシア・EAEU・BRICS中心のため、日本への直接的な政策示唆は限定的で、比較制度分析の参照事例としての価値が中心となる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global hydrogen governance scholarship by mapping how certification, standards, and sustainable-finance frameworks are (or are not) emerging in non-Western blocs — Russia, the EAEU, BRICS, and the SCO. It offers a useful counterpoint to EU/Japan/US hydrogen certification debates and highlights the fragmentation risk in international hydrogen markets, relevant to ISSB/CSRD-adjacent disclosure and transition-finance discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:非西欧圏における水素認証・制度設計の比較事例として、国際水素市場の分断リスクを分析する研究に有用。
🏢実務担当者:ロシア・EAEU・BRICS圏での水素関連事業や調達を検討する企業にとって、現地の規制・認証の未整備リスクを把握する材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:水素の相互認証・共通タクソノミー欠如という制度的課題は、国際的な水素市場ルール形成を議論する際の参照点となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Subject. Regulatory mechanisms for the development of low‑carbon hydrogen in the Russian Federation, the EAEU countries, BRICS, and the SCO. Objectives. To examine the institutional conditions for the formation of a common market for low‑carbon energy carriers under the conditions of the global energy transition. Methods. The study employed methods of comparative institutional analysis, content analysis, and elements of comparative legal analysis. The information base comprises federal and regional regulatory acts of the Russian Federation, documents of the EAEU, BRICS, and SCO, national hydrogen development strategies, as well as materials from international organisations – the IEA, IRENA, and IPHE. Results. It was established that Russia has one of the most elaborated strategic frameworks for hydrogen development; however, it lags behind China, India, Brazil, and the UAE in terms of the level of practical implementation, the depth of certification mechanisms, and the scale of economic incentives. At the EAEU level, there are no uniform mandatory standards, a system of mutual recognition of certificates, or a common taxonomy for low‑carbon hydrogen. BRICS countries demonstrate higher institutional dynamics and a stronger focus on building domestic industrial demand. Conclusions. Competitiveness in the low‑carbon hydrogen market is determined not only by resource potential but, above all, by the maturity of the institutional environment. For Russia, a priority direction is to shift from an export‑oriented model to the development of a domestic consumption market, as well as to enhance coordination with the EAEU and BRICS in the areas of certification, standards, and sustainable financing.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.24891/iezhyofirst seen 2026-10-02 04:50:50
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。